The TV fire and flame retardant controversy: deconstructing the data

Interesante

Health & Environment

Whether or not candles cause TV fires has been a cause of controversy, with a recurring argument between those who believe that a standard for ignition resistance is necessary for television manufacture, and those who believe such a standard results in excessive use of environmentally hazardous flame retardant chemicals.

Instrumental to the case in favour of the ignition standard is data presented in a series of papers derived from an obscure estimate of causes of fire in Sweden. Here, Tom Muir, an independent researcher and former employee of Environment Canada (retired), explains how flaws in these derivations ultimately result in failure to demonstrate a need for an ignition standard.

This is a long article. Click here to download a printer-friendly PDF.

Tealight by Supafine - Morgeufile

In this article:

  • Context to the controversy
  • First encounters
  • Observations about the intent of the SEMKO-Vällingby study
  • The actual findings of the SEMKO-Vällingby study
    • Method 1: Calculating Swedish…

Ver la entrada original 4.665 palabras más

Anuncios

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s